🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.